Skip to main content

Layer 2 · Memory

The Knowledge Architecture

How institutional knowledge is modeled as durable, versioned objects and typed relationships — a living graph rather than documents in folders.

Last updated Version 2.4

A living graph, not a folder

Most organizations store knowledge as documents: files in folders, records in rows, messages in threads. The information is captured, but the meaning— how things relate, why they matter, what depends on what — lives only in people's heads. When people leave, that meaning leaves with them.

The Knowledge Architecture models institutional knowledge as a living graph of durable objects and typed relationships. Documents don't disappear; they become evidence attached to objects rather than the system of record itself. The result is a structure a machine can reason over and a human can trust.

Objects & relationships

A Knowledge Object is a durable, versioned unit — an asset, a supplier, a standard, a decision. It persists independently of any single document and accumulates history over time. Objects are connected by typed relationships (depends-on, supersedes, owned-by, derived-from) that carry explicit meaning, turning isolated facts into a navigable graph.

Because relationships are explicit, the system can answer questions that no document search can: what would be affected if this supplier failed, which decisions relied on a now-retracted assumption, or how a standard propagated across programs.

Ontology & knowledge fabric

A shared ontology normalizes every source so the same entity referenced in a contract, a filing, and a sensor stream resolves to one object. The knowledge fabric then unifies those objects across systems of record into a single queryable model — without copying them into yet another silo.

Evidence & confidence

Every assertion carries its provenance: the source, the timestamp, and the derivation path. Every derivation carries a confidence signal, letting the system distinguish established fact from working hypothesis. This is what makes conclusions defensible — any answer can be traced back to the evidence that produced it.

Core concepts

The vocabulary that recurs throughout the Knowledge Architecture:

Knowledge Objects
Durable, versioned units of institutional knowledge — an asset, a supplier, a decision, a standard — that persist independently of any document that describes them.
Typed Relationships
Explicit, meaningful edges (depends-on, supersedes, owned-by, derived-from) that turn isolated facts into a graph a machine can reason over.
Ontology
The shared vocabulary that normalizes every source, so the same entity referenced in a contract, a filing, and a sensor stream resolves to one object.
Knowledge Fabric
The connective layer that unifies knowledge objects across systems of record into a single queryable model without copying them into a new silo.
Evidence
Every assertion carries its provenance — the source, timestamp, and derivation path — so conclusions remain auditable and defensible.
Institutional Memory
The accumulated, retained knowledge of the organization that survives reorganizations, turnover, and system migrations.
Decision Graph
A structured record of decisions and their rationale, linking options considered, evidence weighed, and outcomes observed.
Identity Graph
A resolved map of people, roles, teams, and agents that grounds access, accountability, and attribution across the model.
Confidence
A first-class signal on assertions and derivations, letting the system distinguish established fact from working hypothesis.